Honda City Car Reviews

I bought City in Jun 2010. I did it after a very long researchthrough personal experince of ppl, internet, pakwheels and practical tests on City and GLi of my friends. I was very much fascinated and liking it. I had to travel to Islamabad, through motorway in Oct. My first long drive on City. After I reached back from Islamabad to Lahore.. the first thing I did was I sold out the City. Reasons were that I was dead tired during the journey and secondly the pick was not that impressive. I bought GLi on the very next day. I had to travel to Peshawar after a month. All the complaints which I had against the City were washed away by the GLi. I like City now. This review based upon my personal experience and is only to help others. Thnx

I HAD TO BUY NEW CAR WHICH CAR I

SHOULD

CHOOSE IAM VERY CONFUSE WETHER I

SHOULD GO FOR CITY OR GLI . I WANT

YOUR HELP PLEASE GIVE ME RIGHT

DESCION.

IWANT YOUR SUGGESTION IN AWEEK .

OK, so I got the delivery of a brand new Honda City MT last week and below is what I have to say:
The drive is very smooth, even when compared to my previous Steermatic (if you discard the difference of transmission, that is). The engine is almost noiseless, the cabin is very secluded too.
The steering is very smooth as well.
The black interior is a pain. Not only is it super prone to dust, it also makes the car unbearably hot to sit in when under direct sunlight. The interior quality is also below par. I expected better.
Compared to the earlier model of City, I don't see any improvement in the cabin room size. Feels the same.
The internal sheet between the engine and the cabin is very thin, it seems. The horn sounds to be going off inside the cabin, it's that loud.
I have been driving the car for around a week now and so far, the econometer says that I am doing around 14.1 kmpl in the city with 100% AC on. Looks good but I can only confirm if this is accurate once I refill.
All in all, I like the car but I feel I deserved better in 1.4 million. Things like rear speakers, alloy rims, better tyres should be standard in this amount.

City is more suited to be driven by girls. Any girl who is driving a city well definetly be more impressed by a boy driving a corolla rather than a boy driving a city. I have a corolla Altis and my girl friends are impressed by my ride. I makes me feel like driving a man's car. On the other hand, when i imagine me driving a city then honestly I feel a little embrassed because it is a Small Girly Car, Its looks are fancy, only girls like fancy things. Corolla have robust looks. If u wanna impress the chicks then go for corolla or atleast a civic. Boy driving a city is a big Loser.

COMPARING CITY WITH XLI?HAHAHAHAHAHA
LOL
XLI = 14LAKHS + NO POWER WINDOWS, NO ABS

CITY = 13.72 LAKHS + POWER WINDOWS AND ABS........

WHY DO YOU COMPARE CITY AND XLI. COROLLA IS A CRAP.
IF U SAY THAT CITY IS A smALL CAR,, U ARE STUPID,, IT IS EQUAL TO SPACE TO THAT CRAP COROLLA AND MUCH COMFORTABLE SEATS... IF U DONT BELIEVE,,,,,, SIT IN BOTH CARS,,,, AND THEN COMMENT. I WZ ABOUT TO BUY XLI. OMG,, THANKS GOD I CHOSE CITY..........
GO TO LAHORE FROM ISLAMABAD IN THAT CRAP COROLLA,,, URE DAMMN TIRED........
THE REASON WHY COROLLA LOOKS BIGGER THAN CITY IS THAT IT HAS MUCH BIGGER BONNET, AND BUMPERS..........
THE TRUNK OF COROLLA IS 490L AND CITY's TRUNK IS 506L.........
CITY's FUEL MILEAGE MAKES ABOVE 20 KM/L IN MoTORWAY AND COROLLA JUST 13-14 KM/L....

NOW CITY HAS A USB PLAYER(ALPINE CDE 100E)
AND COROLLA HAS THE SAME THOUGH THE WHOLE MODEL OF COROLLA IS CHANGED....

COROLLA's 2001-2008 MODEL WAS MUCH BETTER THAN 2009-2010 AND 2011 MODEL (THE NEW ONE).......
LOOK AT THE REAR LIGHTS OF 2011 COROLLA> IT DOESN'T GO UP-TO 160-170 AND CITY EVEN DID A 200. GO TO YOU-TUBE AND U WILL KNOW EVERYTHING... CITY IS MUCH AERODYNAMICAL SO THIS MEANS ACCELERATION IS MUCH BETTER AND CHANCES OF AIR CRASHES ARE MINIMUM. COROLLA HORSE POWER IS 84 AND CITY HORSE POWER IS 100.......CITY HAS ABS AND NOW IT IS A STANDARD SAFETY FEATURE IN MODERN CARS. IF U BRAKE,,,,,AND URE CAR DOESNT HAVE ABS,, UR CAR WILL SKID. SO DONT U CARE FOR URE LIFE.?????... IF in this CENTURY,, A CAR DOESNT HAVE POWER WINDOWS AND ABS,, AND AT MORE PRICE,, U ARE FOOLED.....U OPEN THE WINDOW BY A PLASTIC HANDLE,.,,,,,,,,, COROLLA DOESNT HAVE EVEN CENTRAL LOCKING AND CITY HAS IT..... HOW EVER,,, NONE OF THEM(CITY AND XLI/GLI) HAS ALARM SYSTEM,,(IMMOBILIZER). BOTH CARS HAVE POWER STEERING BUT CITY STEERING IS MUCH SOFTER, SMALLER AND STYLISH..
PAKISTANIS KI MAJBOORI HAY KAY MOSTLY AREA IS VILLAGE AREA SO THEY BUY COROLLA...

IF U LIVE IN A VILLAGE THEN DEFINITELY CHOOSE COROLLA BCZ IT's CLEARENCE IS GOOD AND SUSPENSION IS MUCH SOFT...

DONT BE FOOLED BY POWER SIDE MIRRORS (BACK VIEW MIRRORS) CITY HAS POWER SIDE MIRRORS BUTTON BUT AT THE DOORS,,, NOT AT THE DASHBOARD SO THIS MEANS THAT IN POWER MIRRORS,,< CITY HAS ALSO ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY......OH!!!!!!!!!!!!! I FORGOT TELL YOU SOMETHING THAT WHEN u TURN THE AC OR FAN IN FOOT MODE OR AT HEAD AND FOOT MODE,,,,,, THE REAR SEAT PASSENGERS ALSO GET CHILLED BCZ CITY HAS GOT EXTRA AC PORTS AT THE REAR SEATS,,, (PLACED UNDER THE FRONT SEATS). IT IS A VERY ADVANCED FEATURE. COROLLA DOESNT HAVE THIS FEATURE,,,,, (DONT KNOW ABOUT 2011 COROLLA BUT HOPE NOT) . THE ONLY THING BETTER IN COROLLA IS THAT IT HAS SIDE TURN LAMPS IN SIDE MIRRORS....... BUT IF U SIT IN THE CAR, CITY'S MIRRORS WILL GIVE A MORE BETTER AND BIGGER LOOK WHILE COROLLA'S MIRRORS WILL GIVE A CLASSY AND MUCH WIDER LOOK.....

CITY COMES IN MANY COLOURS I.E BLACK, TAFFETA WHITE, HABNERO RED, BLUE, LIGHT SILVER, GOLDEN(INTRODUCED IN 2011), DARK SILVER.
COROLLA XLI COMES IN ONLY TWO SOLID COLOURS WITH NO METALLIC EFFECT I.E BLACK AND WHITE..........

COMPARE CITY's SHAPE AND COROLLA'S SHAPE.. CITY LOOKS LIKE A COMPACT CAR. IT FRONTS ARE HOT.....
ITS REAR ARE LIKE BMW 5 SERIES. IT HAS A SPORTY LOOK FROM THE SIDE AND IT HAS A STYLISH ANTENNA AT IT'S ROOF..
IM SERIOUSLY TALKING,,,,,,
WE ALL KNOW THAT NOTHING IN THIS WORLD IS PERFECT........
BUT CITY IS 100 TIMES BETTER THAN COROLLA,,,,,,

CITY CAN BE COMPARED ONLY WITH GLI BCZ THEY BOTH HAVE SAME FEATURES BUT LOOK AT THE PRICE OF GLI......ITS 16.5 LAKHS.....PLEASE!!!! IF U DONT BELIEVE ME,,,,,,, TAKE A RIDE OF BOTH CARS........PLZZZZZZ!!! AND THEN COMMENT..........

Well I will post a very geniune opinion on City AT. I have made a mistake. The material which Honda is using is rubbish...all tin total tin. Stand this car on a highway and let a Daewoo passby, your car will make u feel u have swayed. What is the use of having a bloch under the seats. This car has not to be driven by only ladies. Ergonomics if poor. Fuel consumption in city area is not more than 10. I hav a 2 months old car. Touch the roof and u will feel u are touching thermopore...be careful its very fragile. Hell with looks (only front). Buy Corolla, though I never liked it but at least it spacious and does not hav negatives more thyan City.

The most impressive thing about this Honda city is its fuel economy which provides average of 16 km per liter of petrol. It also provides many options, as for as the color is concerned as it comes in 6 different attractive colors.
There are advanced safety features in it. It provides both options for transmission system i.e. automatic and manual. With its beautiful “Arrow short form” design and specious interior. In short this car is blend of style and modern features with very reasonable price.
It runs smoothly without producing harsh noise and any technical disabilities. This competent engine will have the capability to generate 100 bhp, to provide power to car for rushing through highways in whispering sound.
In short COROLLA IS FAR BEHIND THIS BEAUTY.